|
The full story behind this doctor’s exercise precipitation isn’t unique, not one thing to excite the non-fiction writers unless it may be specified as a model of what not to do in medical office management. Having perfectly no background knowledge, college courses, or medical school training in regards to business management, office management, or retail at the time I started my private medical practice, I never thought, let alone even considered this psychological result of perception learning and reasoning would be of much value to me. Unfortunately, even today, most physicians carry on to consider little business office cognition and systems like a popcorn movie-entertaining, but not one thing of practical value.
Over the next 20 years in private exercise I gradually came to recognize the covert signs of a doomed medical practice. I am penitent to confess to anybody I didn’t know how to handle the quicksand of disabling components which surrounded me in my practice. The specific events, which spelled out and magnified my business ignorance, were:
• Violating mutual sense budgeting for the business. By the third year in private exercise I had an probability to buy a little medical building with 5 medical office suites with a very little down payment and remunerated the mortgage with the rental paid by the physician tenants. Seemed like the right decision.
But, to add wood to the fire, my next decision was to spend in regards to $70K to renovate and upgrade my office in that building and figured I’d pay for that over the next 15 years, never giving careful consideration to I might need to move elsewhere sometime, or struggle with the attrition of my practice, or my tenants might move out, or economics of medical exercise might change for the worse (as they did in 1976).
Going into heavy debt just never worried me—-big mistake! Certainly relying on my overconfidence and professional status, how could I lose no matter what came along. Could sound business noesis have prevented this-I’d like to think so. My CPA sure didn’t help me. My corporate attorney didn’t either. None of my family had any business skillfulness to offer me.
• My resourcefulness of my life in medical exercise disappeared. I’ll never know why but one day I sat down when it comes to 5 years into my exercise to undertake and figure out how my exercise was doing and get an idea of whether it was going anywhere. I’d never even thought of keeping stats such as the number of new persons who requires medical care each month, or on anything else affiliated to my practice. So, I relied on the on a monthly basis financial affirmations from my CPA, which I genuinely didn’t recognise how to read or make sense of in any effective manner, as a means of developing critical conclusions in regards to my exercise business-not that you have ever been there. That methodology was and is like rearranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic.
I read the numbers, calculated amounts, categorized the results, and came up with what Winston Churchill called, “A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside and enigma.” Evidently, I had boarded the clue train. One thing was abundantly clear. It would never be possible for me to make sufficient cash in my exercise of OB-Gyn to compensate for my three kid’s college education, nor ever be competent to fund a retirement plan to any sufficient level.
Psychologists, spiritual leaders, self-improvement experts, and mind benders may very well look at my behavioral pattern as a unfeigned example of collective insanity, intellectual immaturity, or need for a psychic hotline. They’re in all likelihood right, within sure bounds and without knowing my personal attributes. But, when it comes to comparing myself to other physicians, then and now, I wonder how galore of them are a mediocre jockey on a hell of a horse.
My thought was, “I’ve gone through the entire instructional gauntlet, sacrificed years of my life to my ambition, invested thousands of imputed dollars in the process, and now I see that what I have to show for it-stinks (a alternate word for the ones I was thinking).”
How could I resolve the dilemma (or how would you)?
–Start a new career that offered more financial gain?
–Start a sideline business to supplement my income?
–Become a paid employee of a managed care group?
–Move my exercise to another area?
–Work longer and harder daily till I burn-out?
–Focus my exercise on high income patient procedures?
–Retrain as a plastic surgeon or anesthesiologist?
You will never convince me that you haven’t run these thoughts through your mind from time to time.
Although you may put yourself in my position and perceive the unending analyzing and agonizing one ought to go through, perchance you have already; a choice has to be made. The choice of taking on business education and merchandising courses must have been added to the list, been a better choice than most of the others, and, unfortunately, remained unrecognized as a business tool among most physicians-even today.
Because most of the selections involved extra costs, numerous time away from practice, and my own rigid thoughts regarding what I mentally and physically could and couldn’t tolerate, I decisive to do real estate investing as a sparetime activity business. It seems to be such an outrageous synthetic experience when I look at it now. Here I couldn’t even think of a practical way to inject my exercise with growth hormone, and then went in front and involved myself in another business I didn’t recognise how to run. It didn’t work out as I had planned. I lost everything except my practice-back to page one. Would all of this have happened if I had been educated in the fundamentals and principles for running a little business (involving merchandising as an integral share of that) as well-maybe.
1. My finish incompetence in managing employees. Although most physicians are competent to eventually, after a Sabbath journeying to reach holy ground, reluctantly receive the “spontaneous” office management system that has emerged amid his or her workers without any venture on their own part, it’s a permanent source of exercise destruction.
I know because I employed that system, never understood how to make it any better, and galore times sat behind my desk after everyone had gone home and had what Joel Osteen, the pastor, calls a “pity party” for myself. Did I actually do that?
But then, if you’re the decision maker, I always remembered the saying, “If you’re not in front of the threat, you’re reacting to it.” And, boy was I reacting to it, exceptionally when I found out sure things going on with my workers behind my back in my office such as:
My receptionist secretly using the copy machine to print up her church bulletins for the congregation weekly without my knowledge. She had been doing it for almost a year before I found out.
2. Example of my working “in” my business rather of “on” my business: My front desk employee assigned to do all the left over filing, answering the phone, and keeping the office open and running on Wednesday when I was not there, decisive on her own to close up the office, put the phones on the answering service, and have a free day off to do her personal things for herself. The other laborers knew it and never told me. I made the invention when I met up with her one Wednesday moving through the shops in the mall. Did I fire her? That’s my next division of discussion below.
3. The importance of employee comradery didn’t mean to me any more than social fundamental interaction happening around the office until the truth slapped me in the face. I decisive to send my top notch back office lady to an Ultrasound training course with regards to 90 miles away so she could do the OB ultrasounds as well as me. She was not competent to tolerate being without her husband for the 21/2 days and insisted he go along. I paid for everything for the venture including hotel, food, travel and the course.
A couple weeks later I found it necessary to terminate my front desk employee. Within two days the back office lady quit with no notice. The back office lady knew why I had fired the front office lady and what she had been doing unethically. I had no idea they were that closely attached, bound by their own “employee honor system,” or invented a perfective window to quit that the other circumstance opened
for her.
Of course, the back office employee, after spending over a thousand dollars on her training, being nice sufficient to remunerate for her husband’s vacation with her, and for 7 years in my office learning medical office functions never noted she was thinking of quitting, yet maltreated my generosity without a second thought. She refused to explain why she was quitting but I suspect she had already lined up a occupation in another doctor’s office to do his ultrasounds for higher pay.
• Can you stomach the results when you let your medical office run itself? My blunders must be a resounding wake-up call for you to begin marching to a dissimilar drummer.
Blunder #1. I wanted everyone to like me, exceptionally my laborers because I have always been a very generous person, easy to like and work with, made few demands on my employees. My very original office employee was an older lady that I shared with two other advisor physicians from the next town. She was very likable, friendly with every one instantly, and could charm any hostile patient right out of their pull-ups. Her experience in medical office work spanned a lot of years. Her choice of working only portion time enabled me to hire a full time office manager.
She was happy doing my office billing and collections percentage time.
Twenty years later she was still there doing the same job. I could never let her go or replace her in spite of the poor occupation she was doing because she was my greatest promoter, seemed to recognise everyone in the medical community, had more connections with other medical offices than any person else, and bragged to closely every one how outstanding a doctor I was and how fantasti I treated my patients. My office income wasn’t the best and the billing processes ofttimes came up lacking, but new people who are in need of medical care held coming in with her name in hand.
It’s what Michael Gerber, author, consultant and business consultant to hundreds of physicians calls a “physician employee” which he describes as a doctor who settles for a mediocre medical exercise and being “good enough.”
Blunder #2: It was one of those examples of how a employee reward scheme over time became “expected” rewards on a regular basis without any increase in their work efforts, efficiency, and productivity. My fault. You see, my thinking was, and is ordinarily what some doctors still think, rewards = results. Absolutely, not true! Rewards don’t increase motivation, it comes from inside.
An example of the extremes I went to were a bit strange and overly generous at times. My excitement when it comes to how well my medical exercise was increasing, mixed with a heap of social jujitsu, and a neck wrestling desire to treat all my employees, led me into goal to be attained amnesia concerning the event. After suitable arrangements were made, office closed for the day, we piled into a commuter flight from San Francisco to San Diego for a joyous day of sport and entertainment. We toured “old town,” made it through Sea World OK, expended the rest of the time buying goods on the waterfront, and had a great meal at a fine restaurant before flying back to the bay area. Naturally, it didn’t cost the laborers a nickel.
The day became the topic of speech in the office for the next few days, the thank you’s were plentiful, and the office work never improved. Sometimes, when you show the caveman “fire,” it triggers an increased obligation and loyalty—but normally not.
Another similar such inspiring undertake at business smarts a couple years later resulted in a good face licking, but not much more. In another of my eureka moments I arranged for a special dinner meeting for all my workers and their spouses at one of the most pricey graceful restaurants in town. Near the end of the dinner I staged a distinctive shiny 14 inch wooden wall plack to each employee which included a gold plate engraved with their own name and underneath the name was a 4 to 6 line personal description I wrote when it comes to their expertness and value to my office team. It impressed the employee’s substantial other, was a terrific way to praise my crew, and was sincerely appreciated. My fault was not taking vantage of the follow-up and demand more from the employees.
Blunder #3: This has to do with my lousy hiring and firing incompetence. Of course, it was the initial time in my life I had to do such things, and had utterly no understanding of the process, consultation process, format for extracting selective information from the candidate, or calibers necessitated for working in a medical office. Experts tell us to “hire slow” and “fire fast.” Thirty years later I in the end heard that.
I had invested a substantial amount of cash in an office computer scheme in the early 1980′s knowing that it would increase office efficiency. None of my workers were computer literate business wise and had to be trained for the process. Shortly after I hired a fellow member of the computer company training team who lived close by and seemed well qualified for medical office work. I didn’t in truth consultation her (bad decision), just asked her if she would like to work for me full time. Her chuckling boisterous personality along with being mentally sharp was a cover for her overly ambitious agenda.
Everyone of my workers were required to wear an office uniform, or white coat and never complained. This lady, once hired, flat refused to wear a uniform or a white coat. It angered me, but rationalized (another mistake) my acceptance of her choice not to comply because she knew computers inside and out and would be an asset to the office.
Over and over again she continued to be a problem—and I continued to rationalize each time. She knew incisively how to manipulate me and do incisively what she chose to do using her computer expertness as leverage. After tolerating her jokes for a few years, sentiment all along I would never be competent to find a good alternate for her expertise, she had to be fired—-and I mentally could not do that procedure (what a wimp). My office manager fired her. The rest of the employees, were happy she was leaving, were well conscious of her manipulation tactics she even used on them, and, remarkably, chose to never once come to me and tell me all that she had been doing that I never found out about.
The whole experience woke up my sixth sense for the primary time, drove red hot spikes through my brain to keep reminding me, raised the bar on employee qualifications, traditionalisti new rules of engagement with my employees, and became a permanent example of the complexities of medical office hierarchy.
Comment:
I am way too penitent to tell you with regards to the rest of my business in-competencies. What is aweinspiring to me is the fact that most physicians suffer with a great deal of of these disabilities, recognise it, contend many times with them—-and never do anything when it comes to it—just like I did for so a lot of years. Getting unstuck from this mindset is not difficult once you recognise how to go when it comes to it.
In the next newsletter I will talk about in detail each of my operational hiccups brought up above and how you need to feed your mind with the right stuff, keep out of the way of these perpetual hassles, and formulate a mindset suitable for managing you office and little business entity using the tools I tell you about.
Satco Nickel Plated Number 90 1089 Sat
The all-new Kindle has a new electronic-ink screen with 50 percent better contrast than any other e-reader, a new sleek design with a 21 percent littler body while still keeping the same 6-inch-size reading area, and a 17 percent lighter weight at just 8.5 ounces. The new Kindle also offers 20 percent more quickly page turns, up to one month of battery life, double the storage to 3,500 books, built-in Wi-Fi, a graphite color option and more—all for only $139.
Satco Nickel Plated Number 90 1089 Sat Picture
Satco Nickel Plated Number 90 1089 Sat Photo
Most helpful client reviews
26088 of 26338 persons found the following review helpful.
 Kindle vs. Nook (updated 1/2/2011)
By Ron Cronovich
If you’re attempting to choose among a Nook and a Kindle, perhaps I may help. My wife and I have owned a Nook (the primary one, not the new Nook Color), a Kindle 2, and a Kindle DX. When Amazon declared the Kindle 3 this summer, we pre-ordered two Kindle 3′s: the wi-fi only model in graphite, and the wi-fi + 3G model in white. They arrived in late August and we have employed them very regularly since then. For us, Kindle is better than Nook, but Nook is a good device with it is own vantages that I will talk about below. I’ll end this review with a few words in regards to the Nook Color.
First, reasons why we prefer the Kindle:
* Speed
In our experience, the Kindle is very zippy equated to the Nook. Page refresh speed (the time it takes a new page to appear after you push the page-turn button) was WAY more immediate on Kindle 2 than on Nook, and it’s rapidly and without delay yet on Kindle 3. Yet, I read a whole book on the Nook and didn’t find the slower page refresh to be annoying – you get used to it, and it’s not a problem.
For me, the more crucial speed divergence worries navigation – moving the cursor around the screen, for example to pick a book from your library, or to jump to a chapter by selecting it in the table of contents. On Kindle, you do this by pushing a 5-way rocker button, and the cursor moves very quickly. On Nook, you do this by activating the color LCD touchscreen (which commonly shuts off when not in use, to conserve battery). A “virtual rocker button” appears on the screen, and you touch it to move the cursor. Unfortunately, the Nook cursor moves very sluggishly. This might not be a big deal to you, but it genuinely got annoying to me, exceptionally since my wife’s Kindle was so quick and responsive.
In November 2010, Nook got a software upgrade that increments page refresh speed and makes navigation more responsive. I returned my Nook months ago, so I cannot tell you if the Nook’s performance is now equivalent to the Kindle’s, but Nook owners in the remarks section have convinced me that the software update improves the experience of using the Nook. If performance is a huge factor in your decision, visit a Best Buy and compare Kindle and Nook side by side.
* Screen contrast
You’ve seen Amazon’s claims that the Kindle 3 e-ink has 50% better contrast than Kindle 2 or other e-ink devices. I have no way of precisely measuring the betterment in contrast, but I may tell you that the Kindle 3 display unquestionably has more contrast than Kindle 2 or Nook. The divergence is noticeable, and important: more screen contrast means less eyestrain when reading in poorly lit rooms.
In well-lit rooms, the Nook and Kindle 2 have sufficient contrast to grant for comfortable reading. But I often times read in low-light conditions, like in bed at night, or in a poorly lit room. In these situations, reading on Nook or Kindle 2 was a bit uncomfortable and often gave me a mild headache. When I got the Kindle 3, the extra contrast was without delay noticeable, and made it more comfortable to read beneath less-than-ideal lighting conditions. (If you go with a Nook, just make sure you have a good reading lamp nearby.)
* Battery life
The Nook’s color LCD touch screen drains it is battery speedily – I could never get more than 5 days out of a charge. The Kindle 2 had longer battery life than the Nook, and Kindle 3 has even longer life: in the 3 months since we received our Kindle 3′s, we quintessentially get 3 weeks of battery life amongst charges. (We keep wireless off in regards to half the time to save battery power.)
* Weight
Nook weighs with regards to 3 ounces more than the new Kindle, and you may in truth feel the difference. Without a case, Nook is still light sufficient to hold in one hand for long reading sessions without fatigue. But in a case, Nook is a heavy sucker. The new Kindle 3 is so light, even in a case, we find it comfortable keeping in one hand for long reading sessions.
Reasons numerous people might prefer the Nook:
* In-store experience
If you need help with your nook, you may take it to any barnes and noble and get a real humane to help. You may take your nook into the coffee shop section of your local B&N store and read any book for free for up to one hour per day. When you take your nook to B&N, numerous in-store special deals and the occasional free book pop up on your screen.
* User-replaceable battery
Rechargeable batteries in the long run lose their capacity to hold a charge. Nook’s battery is user-replaceable and comparatively inexpensive. To replace Kindle’s battery, Amazon wants you to ship your Kindle to Amazon, and they will ship you back a DIFFERENT Kindle than the one you sent (it’s the same model, for example if you send a white Kindle 3, you get a white Kindle 3 back, but you get a “refurbished” one, NOT the precise one you sent them). I don’t like this at all.
However, assorted humans have posted remarks here that have eased my concerns. Someone looked up stats on the Kindle’s battery and did a good deal of simple calculations to show that it ought to last for 3 or more years. Before that happens, I will surely have upgraded to a newer Kindle model by then. Also, an individual found a heap of companies that trade Kindle batteries at reasonable cost and have how-to videos that demonstrate how we may replace the battery ourselves. Doing this would void the Kindle’s warranty, but the battery will probably not fail until long after the warranty expires.
* ePub
Nook uses the ePub format, a widely used open format. Amazon uses a proprietary ebook format. Many libraries will “lend” ebooks in the ePub format, which works with nook but not kindle. However, a free and reputable program called Calibre allows you to translate ebooks from one format to another – it supports a heap of formats, including ePub and Kindle. The only catch is that it doesn’t work with copy-protected ebooks, so you can’t, for example, buy a Kindle book (which is copy protected) and translate it to ePub so you may read it on a Nook.
* Nook’s color LCD touchscreen
The firstborn Nook has a little color LCD screen on the bottom for navigation. This could be a pro or con, depending on your preferences. It makes the Nook hipper and less drab than Kindle. Some people receive pleasure from using the color LCD to view their library or navigate. I did, at first. But after two weeks of use, and comparings with my wife’s Kindle, I found the consecrated buttons of the Kindle requiring little effort and far rapidly and without delay to use than the Nook’s color touchscreen. I likewise found the bright light from the color screen distracting when I was attempting to read a book or newspaper (though when not in use, it shuts off after a minute or so to conserve battery).
* expandable capacity
Nook comes with 2GB of internal memory. If you need more capacity, you may insert a microSD card to add up to 16GB more memory. Kindle comes with 4GB of internal memory – twice as much as Nook – but there’s no way to exaggerate that. Kindle doesn’t receive memory cards of any type. If you mainly use your device to read ebooks and newspapers, this shouldn’t be an issue. I have over 100 books on my Kindle, and I’ve employed only a tiny fraction of the memory. Once Kindle’s memory fills up, just delete books you don’t need prompt access to; you may always restore them later, in seconds, for free.
A few other notes:
Kindle and Nook have other features, such as an MP3 player and a web browser, but I caution you to have low expected values for these features. The MP3 player on the Kindle is like the first-generation iPod shuffle – you can’t see what song is playing, and you can’t navigate to other songs on your device. I don’t like the browser on either device; e-ink is just not a good engineering science for surfing the web; it’s slower and clunkier than LCD screen technology, so even the browser on an Android phone or iPod touch is more gratifying to use. However, numerous commenters have more favorable views of either device’s browser, and you might, too.
* ebook lending
If you have a Nook or a Kindle, you may “lend” an ebook you purchased to somebody else with the same device for up to two weeks. The Nook has always had this feature. The Kindle just got this feature as of December 2010. Most but not all purchased ebooks are lendable, due to publisher restrictions.
* PDF support
Kindle and Nook both handle PDF files, but in dissimilar ways. When you put a PDF file on your nook, nook converts it into an ebook-like file, then you may adjust the font size, and the text and pagination will adjust just like with any ebook. But you cannot see the introductory PDF file in the native format in which it was created. Kindle 3 and Kindle DX have native support for PDF files. You may see PDF files just as they would appear on your computer. You may also convert PDF files to an ebook-like format, and then Kindle handles them just the way the Nook handles them – text and pagination adjust when you modify the font size. Unfortunately, galore symbols, equations, and graphics get lost or mangled in the translation – even when looking at PDF files in their native format on the Kindle. Moreover, the little screen size of the Kindle 3 and the Nook is not outstanding for PDF files, most of which are designed for a more spectacular page size. You may zoom and pan, but this is cumbersome and tiresome. Thanks to commenters who suggested watching PDF files in landscape mode on the Kindle (I don’t recognise if you may do this on Nook); this way, you may see the entire top half of the page without panning, and then scroll down to the bottom half. This works a little better.
SUMMARY:
Nook and Kindle each offer their own advantages. We like the nook’s user-replaceable battery, compatibility with ePub format, and in-store experience. But we strongly prefer Kindle 3 because it is performance is zippier, it is higher-contrast screen is more comfortable to read, and it’s littler and lighter so it is more portable and more comfortable to hold in one hand for long reading sessions.
* Nook Color
Everything I wrote in regards to the Nook in this review applies to the firstborn Nook (which proceeds to be available), not the new Nook Color. To me, the Nook Color is in a dissimilar product category than the Kindle or firstborn Nook. Nook Color has an LCD screen, like an iPad or most computer monitors. That’s a big disfavor for humans like me, who get headaches from reading a computer screen for long periods of time. Amazon’s Kindle product page has an informative division on e-ink vs. LCD displays.
But a great deal of persons don’t have difficultnesses reading from computer screens, and the Nook Color is getting glowing reviews in the press and by owners. For the money, it offers a lot of functionality such as a good web browser and the capacity to play games and watch movies. But keep in mind: it costs a lot more than the Kindle, it weighs almost twice as much, it doesn’t come in a 3G version, and (unlike the original Nook) the Nook Color doesn’t have a user replaceable battery.
8217 of 8393 humans found the following review helpful.
 Worth the money. Not perfect, but very very good for commence to finish novels in good light
By Jeffrey Stanley
The Kindle is my initial e-ink reader. I own an iPad, an iPhone, and have owned a Windows-based phone in the past that I employed as an ereader.
My overall impression of the device is good.
The good:
I’d candidly rather read linear (read from page one to the end, one page at a time) fiction from it than a book, because I can’t always get comfortable with a book. Hardcovers are once in a while a bit heavy, and paperbacks don’t always lie open easily. The Kindle is fabulously light and thin. I may hold it in one hand easily. The page turn buttons are conveniently located. Page-turns aren’t instant, but they’re in all probability rapidly and without delay than turning a physical page in a printed book (there are just a lot more page-turns unless you choose a little font). The contrast is better than other ereaders I’ve seen. There is zero eye strain in good light. My eyesight isn’t the greatest and I like being competent to increase the font size and read without glasses. I love being competent to browse the Kindle store and read samples before resolving to purchase. The “experimental” browser is astoundingly usable, but isn’t great. It is utile for browsing wikipedia and blogs. The biggest drawback to the browser is the awkward pointer navigation, using the 5-way pad. It syncs your furthest read page over the internet so you may pick up where you left off using your iPhone or iPad.
The so-so:
The kindle store could use more categories and sorting options. You can’t sort by “top rated,” and there is no category for “alternate histories,” for example. Finding a very-specific type of fiction relies on keyword searches, which don’t do a great job. The wifi once in a while doesn’t connect before it times-out. You seldom need the wifi, but it is annoying if you change a setting, answer “OK” to the prompt to connect, and the thing tells you it failed to connect two seconds later (the precise moment it suggests that it did in the long run connect, then you need to go back to update the setting again). Most settings don’t require a connection, but it is a minor annoyance. Most of your time will be expended reading, and of course your books are stored on the device and a connection is not required. Part of me wishes I’d purchased the 3G model, because the browser is good sufficient that having lifetime free 3G wireless would be worth the extra money. Magazines don’t look very good and are not very easy to navigate. There is minor glare in a heap of lighting conditions, for the most part when a lamp is positioned behind the reader’s head.
The bad:
The contrast is reasonable to poor in dim light. It is much requiring little effort to read a printed page in dim light. In good light, contrast is on par with a pulp paperback. In dim light it feels almost like reading from an old Palm Pilot (resolution is better than an old Palm, but contrast is bad in dim light). The screen is little sufficient that the frequency of page turns is beauteous high. Even in good light, the light gray background is less pleasant than the eggshell background of a printed page. You must tell it to sync before you switch it off, if you suppose the feature permitting you to pick up where you left off using other gadgets to work correctly. The copy shelter prevents you from using the files on anything other than Kindle software or devices.
Vs iPad:
IPad is a lot better for magazines, reference materials, and illustrated materials. Kindle is worlds better for reading novels. IPad is gorgeous heavy, making it more difficult to hold in your hand or carry with you everywhere. Kindle is much more portable and posing no difficulty to hold. IPad has a lot of amazing children’s books and magazines, which take vantage of it is multimedia features. IPad is unreadable in sunlight and glare is bad in bright light. Kindle is as good as a printed page in bright light. Ipad serves as a originative tool, a computing tool, a gaming tool, and a communication tool. Kindle is only a novel machine. I don’t regret buying either one of them. An iPad won’t replace books, but a Kindle can, if the book is text-only.
I highly commend this device at it is new low price if you are a ordinary reader of novels. I love my kindle. Just don’t suppose it to be more than it is. Leave the magazines and such to the tablet computers.
1279 of 1302 people found the following review helpful.
 I Wanted a Dedicated E-Reader, and That’s What I Got
By Matthew E. Coenen
I’m a first-time Kindle owner, so I have not one thing to “compare” the latest Kindle to. I don’t own a Nook. I don’t own an iPad (and, in any case, that’s comparing apples to oranges). I don’t have a Sony e-reader. ‘
This will be a short, simple review.
I received my Kindle when it comes to a week ago and haven’t been competent to put it down.
Things I like when it comes to my Kindle?
1. The e-ink display is amazing.
2. Using the 5-way controller is simple and effective.
3. Page turn speeds are rapidly and without delay than I thought they would be.
4. It’s lightweight, even with the attached cover (I have an Amazon cover with a built-in light)
5. Page-turning buttons are quiet and well-placed.
6. Recharge time is fast.
7. I may order a book and begin reading it in less than 60 seconds. Nice!
8. Portability… I may take 3,000 books with me when I travel for work and not require further and added suitcases or baggage fees.
Things I’m not too keen on?
1. Buttons are too close together and are laid out oddly.
2. Lack of person number buttons is frustrating.
3. Power button on the bottom? Not a bad thing. Just an odd thing. (Same for the headphone input). I normally rest the “bottom” of a book on my lap when I read.
Things I hope modify in the future?
1. How books are organized… When I put a book in a collection (which is actually a “tag”), it still appears in the main list. It’s not actually “moved”, it’s plainly associated.
2. The look of the main screen. I’d like “folders” or numerous other way to display “collections”.
3. Ability to construct personal “screen savers.”
4. E-book pricing, even though Amazon has little control over this. Still, most titles are the same price as or less than their hardback/paperback counterparts. (And I’m not opposed to paying more for comfortableness and portability).
Things that don’t bother me when it comes to other reviews?
1. The browser is experimental. Amazon has formulated a committed e-reader, and it’s meant to be applied to read. Period. Not browse the web. If you want to browse the web, get a computer — not an e-reader.
2. The Kindle is not an mP3 player, either. Yes, it’s nice to have a lot of classical music playing in the background while I read, but I don’t need to see the title of the song, album art, etc. (And you may skip from track to track on the Kindle using shortcut keys).
3. Lack of a “color” or “touch” screen.
In summary, for $139, I’m rather thrilled with my buy and have arleady read multiple books on it. In fact, I think I’ve read more in the past week than I’ve read in the past month.
See all 23576 client reviews…
|